Jean louis barsoux biography of abraham lincoln
•
Jean louis barsoux biography of abraham lincoln
President of the United States differ 1861 to 1865
For other uses, inspect Abraham Lincoln (disambiguation).
"President Lincoln" redirects near. For the troopship, see USS President Lincoln.
Abraham Lincoln | |
|---|---|
Lincoln in 1863 | |
| In office March 4, 1861 – April 15, 1865 | |
| Vice President | |
| Preceded by | James Buchanan |
| Succeeded by | Andrew Johnson |
| In office March 4, 1847 – March 3, 1849 | |
| Preceded by | John Henry |
| Succeeded by | Thomas L. Harris |
| In office December 1, 1834 – December 4, 1842 | |
| Preceded by | Achilles Morris |
| Born | (1809-02-12)February 12, 1809 Hodgenville, Hardin County (now LaRue County, Kentucky), U.S. |
| Died | April 15, 1865(1865-04-15) (aged 56) Washington, D.C., U.S. |
| Manner of death | Assassination by gunshot |
| Resting place | Lincoln Tomb |
| Political party | |
| Other political affiliations | National Union (1864–1865) |
| Height | 6 ft 4 in (193 cm)[1] |
| Spouse | Mary Todd (m. ) |
| Children | |
| Parents | |
| Relatives | Lincoln family |
| Occupation | |
| Signature | |
| Branch/service | Illinois Militia |
| Years of service | April–July 1832 |
| Rank | |
| Unit | 31st (Sangamon) Regiment of Ill • Guilfoyle, Douglas --- "Lacking Conviction: Is the International Criminal Court Broken? An Organisational Failure Analysis" [2019] MelbJlIntLaw 16; (2019) 20(2) Melbourne Journal of International Law 401LACKING CONVICTION: IS THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT BROKEN? AN ORGANISATIONAL FAILURE ANALYSIS Lacking Conviction: Is the International Criminal Court Broken? Douglas Guilfoyle[1]* There is a widespread sense that something in the International Criminal Court (‘ICC’) needs fixing. This prompts questions including: is it broken, who is responsible, and how is it to be fixed? This article avoids the discourse of a ‘crisis in international criminal law’ in favour of the literature on organisational failure. This literature focuses on the role of environment, structure and leadership in organisational performance. In particular, this paper posits that the ICC is embroiled in a fiasco, defined as a situation in which a public organisation’s policy choices result in unintended political consequences. As a fiasco unfolds, the organisation at its centre, and its defenders, may seek to ascribe responsibility or displace blame. This article thus: examines the case that the ICC is failing in its core mission and assesses whether common defence |