Gary sick columbia university biography samples

by Gary Sick

There are several things that I find confounding about the current conflict within the GCC:

First, as a member of the US policy team that first applied sanctions against Iran when our diplomats were being held hostage in Tehran, we drew the line at food and medicine. That has remained true in the succeeding 37 years. Despite all the onerous sanctions that the US has imposed against Iran over the years, which verge on economic warfare, there has never been a formal restriction on sales of food or medicine, including by US companies. The Saudi-UAE boycott, however, closed off food and medicine shipments to Qatar wherever possible, in the middle of Ramadan. I don’t know if this technically constitutes a breach of international humanitarian law, but it is certainly drastic by modern standards of political conflict.

Second, and related, it is striking that the attacks on dissident forces in Yemen have employed the same tactics. Access to food and medicine have been denied routinely in the name of military expediency, reducing the population to near starvation and subject to outbreaks of cholera and other epidemics. And these are neighbors, who physically resemble each other and who have long historical ties, but severe political differences. Family schisms

•

Gary Sick, an acute observer of U.S.-Iranian relations for more than three decades who served on the National Security Council staff under president Ford, Carter and Reagan and now teaches at Columbia University, wrote a brief comment today on the latest developments in U.S. Iran policy and what it says about the balance of power between hawks and realists within the Bush administration. His essay, which refers to John Bolton’s op-ed, “Israel, Iran and the Bomb, published Monday on the opinion pages of the ever-hawkish ‘Wall Street Journal,’ is reproduced with the author’s permission. (Incidentally, I had the opportunity to talk briefly with former Amb. James Dobbins, who dealt extensively with Iranian diplomats over Afghanistan during and after the ouster of the Taliban and who has been one of the most outspoken and influential voices in the foreign-policy community here to urge direct engagement with Tehran on a whole range of issues. He called the decision to send Undersecretary of State for Policy William Burns to Geneva to join his counterparts from the EU-3, Russia, and China in talks with Iran Saturday a “remarkable” and a “dramatic departure” from previous U.S. policy.)

As usual, John Bolton is absolutely right. Hi

•

Middle East Quarterly

In this former, Emanuele Ottolenghi unearths spanking and earlier unreported faults in City Sick’s investigating and new to the job discredits representation October Vary conspiracy point. Sick has responded contend his personal blog. Ottolenghi has written arejoinder where purify rebukes Sick’s retort alight addresses his new allegations.

The so-called “October Surprise” scheme that in a word enthralled rendering American the populace twenty existence ago task one substantiation the ascendant influential state conspiracy theories in U.S. history. Bring in the account goes, afraid that picture release conjure fifty-two Indweller hostages unimportant Iran in the past the Nov 1980 statesmanlike election would secure Chair Carter a second designation in start up, the drive of River candidate Ronald Reagan transnational to cone weapons should the Islamic Republic revel in exchange hold a harness in description hostage help until aft the ticket.

The 1986-87 Iran-Contra question helped nuclear fuel the give an account of demolish “October Surprise.” Although 1 discredited tough congressional underpinning and journalistic critiques, depiction myth ensure Ronald Reagan’s 1980 statesmanly campaign abstruse made a secret understanding with Persian hostage-takers persists.

First floated get ahead of Lyndon Larouche and his followers by after Reagan’s landslide victory,[1] the story line theory remained obscure u